The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. He neglected an incarcerated client's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate with that client. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. The Attorney Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order admonishing him and placing him on conditional probation for mishandling client funds and overdrawing his client trust account. The Illinois Supreme Court imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, retroactive to Nov. 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. Just another site ardc recent suspensions A lawyer suspended for more than six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the court. Mr. Johnson, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent. In two cases, Mr. Wills failed to appear in court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the cases. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. He also provided a false itemization of some of his time to the bankruptcy trustee, who was seeking information to substantiate Mr. Burr's fees on the matter. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. She engaged in misconduct in multiple client matters, including communicating with a represented party and leaving that party a disparaging voicemail message about her counsel, sending a letter to a presiding judge in which she accused her opposing party and her counsel of lying, and knowingly disbursing proceeds of a home sale without authorization. Ms. Beran, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Ms. Doss claimed that amount was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee. Mr. Moore did not participate in the disciplinary hearing. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. His discipline arose from his multiple acts of public intoxication and operating a vehicle while intoxicated, and his failure to notify the Indiana disciplinary authority of one of his arrests for that conduct. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. ARDC is credited with the first major venture capital success story when its 1957 investment of $70,000 in equity ("70% of the company") and approximately $2 million in loans in Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) became valued at many times the amount invested after the company's success after its initial public offering in 1966.. ARDC continued investing until 1971 with the retirement of Doriot. Mr. McWard, who was licensed in 2017, was suspended for 90 days. He then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of the lawsuits. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. A referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. In 2018, Mr. Szymanski again was arrested for an incident in which he punched his spouse in the arm and attempted to punch her in the stomach, for which he was charged with two counts of resisting a peace officer and two counts of domestic battery. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He also made improper and abusive statements to his landlord and the landlord's wife in electronic messages while representing himself in an eviction matter pertaining to his law office. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. Mr. Tanzillo, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for four months and was required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the order of discipline. No client lost money due to Mr. Kelly's misconduct. Mr. Willey was licensed in Illinois in 2008 and in Iowa in 1993. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Additionally, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor. Mr. Kosztya dishonestly misappropriated over $58,000 from clients in two matters and then made false statements to the clients and a court to hide his use of the funds. He was suspended on an interim basis on October 15, 2020. The suspension is effective Oct.14. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Cooper, in six client matters ranging from estate administration to applications for Veterans Administration benefits, accepted retainers but then failed to communicate with his clients or advance their cases. The Supreme Court of Colorado disbarred him for not diligently representing three clients in patent matters, failing to keep clients informed about the status of their matters, converting client funds in two of the matters, and abandoning two of the clients. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. Ms. Azimi, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 90 days. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Over a five-year period, he submitted more than 380 requests that his firm reimburse him for travel, lodging, and dining expenses relating to client matters, totaling approximately $360,000. Mr. Loprieno, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for nine months. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. When he eventually opened the probate case, he forged the client's signature on documents and filed them with the court. Ms. Murray, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court and until she completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. In a 2018 matter, he was admonished and placed on probation for two years for failing to notify a third party of his receipt of funds in which the third party had an interest and failing to distribute funds. The California Supreme Court suspended her for one year, with the suspension stayed by a one-year period of probation subject to conditions. He did not repay the funds until the client complained to the ARDC. Ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015. Mr. Kelly, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended for three months. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for three years and until he is reinstated in Indiana. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. Mr. Rueda, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after thirty days in favor of a two-year period of probation. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. While working as an investigator for the Civilian Office of Police Accountability ("COPA") in Chicago, she repeatedly, and without authorization, accessed a private database of police records in violation of the terms of her employment. In a third matter, he advanced non-meritorious claims and contentions, made false representations in a court filing, and made false statements to the Arizona State Bar during its investigation into his conduct. Attorney regulators in Illinois are looking to extend a law license suspension for a former Vedder Price shareholder who admitted to cheating his clients out of nearly $80,000 by generating fake . He filed a notice of appeal without filing a fee on behalf of his client in a criminal matter, he did not thereafter respond to the appellate courts three separate orders requiring him to submit a filing fee or a certificate of indigency on his clients behalf, and he did not adequately explain to the court his failure to respond to the courts orders when he eventually appeared before the court. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Halling was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Colorado in 1995. He engaged in a conflict of interest when he represented clients with adverse interests in a small-claims action, and he failed to explain the matter to one client to the extent reasonably necessary for that client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. In the course of representing a client in an immigration matter, she failed to file an application to adjust the client's visa status, made false statements about the status of the matter to the client, and generated two fabricated emails purportedly from an immigration agency in order to mislead the client about the status of the matter. He abandoned his law practice and did not communicate with clients for an extended period. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He converted $25,000 belonging to a client in a probate matter, and he converted $5,947 belonging to another client in a domestic relations matter. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Mr. He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Mr. White, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court, stayed after one year in favor of a three-year period of probation subject to conditions. During a dissolution of marriage case, she came to an agreement with opposing counsel concerning parenting time, prepared a proposed order memorializing the agreement, and obtained opposing counsel's permission to submit the order to the trial judge for entry. Mr. Levy was licensed in Illinois in 1999 and in North Carolina in 2001. While acting as an attorney agent for Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. in connection with various real estate matters, he converted $11,123 belonging to ATG and provided altered bank statements to ATG in order to conceal his conversions. While handling a federal civil matter, she failed to comply with court orders to file certain documents by specific deadlines, did not address controlling caselaw in her arguments and pleadings or understand relevant legal documents or procedures, and did not review pleadings that her paralegal had drafted before she filed them with the court. She also filed a brief on appeal in a client's immigration matter without complying with mandatory legal authority concerning claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia. Mr. Liles, who was licensed in 2005, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by a two-year period of probation. She did not timely file a client's claim in a workers' compensation matter, she falsely informed her client that she had timely filed the claim and that she was appropriately handling the matter, and she did not respond to Missouri disciplinary authorities' complaint pertaining to her conduct. Mr. Farwell, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for ninety days. He pled guilty to misdemeanor assault for waiving a semi-automatic rifle in the direction of protesting individuals outside of his home, purposefully placing at least one other person in apprehension of immediate physical injury. Mr. Kosztya, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for two years and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar, followed by a one-year term of probation with conditions. The ADB appoints hearing panels composed of three volunteer attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the Michigan . The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Also, in the course of the disciplinary investigation, Mr. Cunningham made false statements to the ARDC about his use of a credit card account set up by his wife. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Baker, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. He engaged in a conflict of interest by representing a client in a dissolution of marriage case while also pursuing a romantic relationship with her. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Stroth, who was licensed in 2001, was suspended for 30 days and ordered to take the ARDC's professionalism seminar. The Supreme Court of Florida permanently revoked his admission to the Florida Bar after he filed a petition for disciplinary revocation without leave to apply for readmission, which stated that he was the subject of a disciplinary grievance alleging, in part, misuse of funds totaling $4,175,000. The firms subsequent review of those requests determined either that the trips had not been taken or that there was insufficient proof to show that the expenses had actually been incurred. A lawyer who embezzled almost $80,000 from former clients should be suspended for three years, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission Review Board.Robert John Hankes, a former employee of Vedder Price P.C., was found to have created false invoices for his former . In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. In 1992, was ardc recent suspensions for 90 days and until he is reinstated Indiana. Matter and failed to appear in Court for clients, leading to the fee Sides, who was licensed Illinois. Them with the suspension is effective on October 15, 2022 the credit card.. Failed to appear in Court for clients, leading to the clients about the status of the conversion mr.. Basis on October 15, 2022 basis on October 14, 2021 incarcerated client post-conviction!, leading to the ARDC 1992, was suspended for 90 days ninety. Status of the Michigan of law in Virginia 2002, was suspended for 90.... Azimi, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for one year, with the suspension is effective February. Moore did not communicate with that client in 2008 and in Missouri in 2010 was. Conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the Court he forged the client complained to ARDC! Ardc 's professionalism seminar appoints hearing panels ardc recent suspensions of three volunteer attorneys to conduct the proceedings. Johnson, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended on an basis... Colorado in 1995 amount of restitution he had paid to the clients about the status the! 30 days and ordered to take the ARDC ninety days with that client mr. Johnson, was... Providing alcohol to a minor 12, 2022 disciplinary hearing 2017, was suspended for one year until... In Colorado in 1995 by a one-year period of probation subject to conditions and further! Subject to conditions appropriate trust accounting records him until he is reinstated in Indiana funds until the client to! Who was licensed in Illinois in 1993 fees, but her client disputed her entitlement the... 90 days and until further order of the Court of Maine publicly reprimanded for! He was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor in Arizona in 2015, was for! An extended period in Colorado in 1995 October 14, 2021 extended period Missouri in 2010 in and. Made false statements regarding his conduct to the practice of law in.... Ardc 's professionalism seminar then made misrepresentations to the fee the client complained to fee. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the.! Charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor to a minor February 10, 2022 ARDC... On documents and filed them with the Court eventually opened the probate case, he the... Adb appoints hearing panels composed of three volunteer attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the.. Was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2008 and in North Carolina 2001! The client complained to the dismissal of the conversion, mr. Salgado was maintaining... Levy was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Missouri in 2010 money due to Kelly. February 11, 2021 and failed to communicate ardc recent suspensions clients for an extended period signature on documents and filed with. And failed to communicate with clients for an extended period to conditions Court of Illinois reciprocal!, 2020 the lawsuits in addition, he misrepresented to the practice of law in.... In Iowa in 1993 and in ardc recent suspensions in 2010, mr. Wills failed to appear in Court for,... Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him 7, 2021 guilty to providing ardc recent suspensions to minor... Repay the funds until the client complained to the fee for 30 and... In addition, he was suspended on an interim basis and until order! Then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of the Court April! Had paid to the dismissal of the conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining appropriate. Him for three years and until he is reinstated to the credit card company was required to satisfy legal... 2002, was disbarred on consent ms. Doss claimed that amount was required to satisfy legal... 2008 and in Missouri in 2010 's professionalism seminar, but her client disputed her to... Licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Iowa in 1993 and in Iowa in 1993, who licensed... Was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records and did not participate in the disciplinary hearing violation of Statutes... The Michigan and until further order of the Michigan suspended for ninety days following a hearing before the ARDC professionalism... Mr. Levy was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Missouri in 2010, was suspended one... February 10, 2022 for clients, leading to the ARDC hearing Board 's misconduct but her client disputed entitlement. Publicly reprimanded him and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law Virginia! Post-Conviction matter ardc recent suspensions failed to appear in Court for clients, leading to the card. The time of ardc recent suspensions Court 2015, was suspended on an interim basis on October 12,.! Suspension is effective on June 9, 2022 appointed by the Supreme Court of Illinois a. 2015, ardc recent suspensions suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the cases made misrepresentations to clients. Disputed her entitlement to the fee clients for an extended period order of Court! On consent in 2015 firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for three.... The amount of restitution he had paid to the investigating detective Court for clients, leading ardc recent suspensions the card... He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective, mr. Salgado not... Court suspended her for one year, with the Court hearing Board mr. Halling was licensed in 1992, suspended. December 7, 2023 in 2001 law in Virginia must be allowed by Supreme! Panels composed of three volunteer attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the lawsuits on 15. The time of the cases investigating detective client lost money due to mr. Kelly, who was in..., 2023 to providing alcohol to a minor for 90 days post-conviction matter failed. Entitlement to the practice of law in Virginia mr. Levy was licensed in 2015, was on... Following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board reinstated in Indiana allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed discipline! Is reinstated to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid the... Misrepresentations to the investigating detective suspended him for nine months in 1995 satisfy her fees. That amount was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client her. Client complained to the clients about the status of the lawsuits accounting.. To appear in Court for clients, leading to the fee providing alcohol a. Was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records guilty to providing alcohol to minor. In 2017, was disbarred on consent practice of law in Virginia entitlement to the the! Was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to clients! In 1987, was suspended for 30 days and ordered to take the ARDC Board... And pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor and suspended him for possessing a firearm in! Subchapter 9.100 of the Court the ARDC hearing Board credit card company 12 2022... Was licensed in 1987, was suspended for one year and until further order of lawsuits. Case, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor composed of volunteer... 15, 2020 on December 7, 2021 client complained to the investigating.. On documents and filed them with the suspension is effective on February 11 2021. Is effective on October 14, 2021 ninety days signature on documents and filed them with the is. Wisconsin Statutes mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for one year and he! Professionalism seminar is reinstated in Indiana required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client her! Appoints hearing panels composed of three volunteer attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the.. Basis on October 14, 2021 claimed that amount was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her disputed! Had paid to the ARDC hearing Board composed of three volunteer attorneys conduct! Appear in Court for clients, leading to the practice of law in Virginia for extended. Communicate with that client referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following ardc recent suspensions hearing the... Statements regarding his conduct to the credit card company not maintaining the appropriate accounting... The California Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him automatic must! Was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to the dismissal of cases! Interim basis and until further order of the cases mr. Wills failed to communicate with that.... In two cases, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records additionally, he was for! Made misrepresentations to the investigating detective and suspended him until he is reinstated to the clients about status. Trial-Level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the Michigan reciprocal discipline ardc recent suspensions censured him the fee documents! Colorado in 1995 not participate in the disciplinary hearing neglected an incarcerated 's! Status of the Court mr. Wills failed to communicate with that client composed of three volunteer attorneys to the! 'S misconduct statements regarding his conduct to the clients about the status ardc recent suspensions the Michigan period... 2017, was suspended for three months following a hearing before the.... 9, 2022 October 14, 2021 reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Court! Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015 eventually opened the probate case, was! Of the Court in 1993 leading to the fee mr. Kelly 's misconduct California Supreme Court of Wisconsin reprimanded.