The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. He neglected an incarcerated client's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate with that client. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. The Attorney Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order admonishing him and placing him on conditional probation for mishandling client funds and overdrawing his client trust account. The Illinois Supreme Court imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, retroactive to Nov. 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. Just another site ardc recent suspensions A lawyer suspended for more than six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the court. Mr. Johnson, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent. In two cases, Mr. Wills failed to appear in court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the cases. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. He also provided a false itemization of some of his time to the bankruptcy trustee, who was seeking information to substantiate Mr. Burr's fees on the matter. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. She engaged in misconduct in multiple client matters, including communicating with a represented party and leaving that party a disparaging voicemail message about her counsel, sending a letter to a presiding judge in which she accused her opposing party and her counsel of lying, and knowingly disbursing proceeds of a home sale without authorization. Ms. Beran, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Ms. Doss claimed that amount was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee. Mr. Moore did not participate in the disciplinary hearing. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. His discipline arose from his multiple acts of public intoxication and operating a vehicle while intoxicated, and his failure to notify the Indiana disciplinary authority of one of his arrests for that conduct. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. ARDC is credited with the first major venture capital success story when its 1957 investment of $70,000 in equity ("70% of the company") and approximately $2 million in loans in Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) became valued at many times the amount invested after the company's success after its initial public offering in 1966.. ARDC continued investing until 1971 with the retirement of Doriot. Mr. McWard, who was licensed in 2017, was suspended for 90 days. He then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of the lawsuits. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. A referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. In 2018, Mr. Szymanski again was arrested for an incident in which he punched his spouse in the arm and attempted to punch her in the stomach, for which he was charged with two counts of resisting a peace officer and two counts of domestic battery. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He also made improper and abusive statements to his landlord and the landlord's wife in electronic messages while representing himself in an eviction matter pertaining to his law office. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. Mr. Tanzillo, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for four months and was required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the order of discipline. No client lost money due to Mr. Kelly's misconduct. Mr. Willey was licensed in Illinois in 2008 and in Iowa in 1993. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Additionally, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor. Mr. Kosztya dishonestly misappropriated over $58,000 from clients in two matters and then made false statements to the clients and a court to hide his use of the funds. He was suspended on an interim basis on October 15, 2020. The suspension is effective Oct.14. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Cooper, in six client matters ranging from estate administration to applications for Veterans Administration benefits, accepted retainers but then failed to communicate with his clients or advance their cases. The Supreme Court of Colorado disbarred him for not diligently representing three clients in patent matters, failing to keep clients informed about the status of their matters, converting client funds in two of the matters, and abandoning two of the clients. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. Ms. Azimi, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 90 days. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Over a five-year period, he submitted more than 380 requests that his firm reimburse him for travel, lodging, and dining expenses relating to client matters, totaling approximately $360,000. Mr. Loprieno, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for nine months. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. When he eventually opened the probate case, he forged the client's signature on documents and filed them with the court. Ms. Murray, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court and until she completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. In a 2018 matter, he was admonished and placed on probation for two years for failing to notify a third party of his receipt of funds in which the third party had an interest and failing to distribute funds. The California Supreme Court suspended her for one year, with the suspension stayed by a one-year period of probation subject to conditions. He did not repay the funds until the client complained to the ARDC. Ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015. Mr. Kelly, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended for three months. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for three years and until he is reinstated in Indiana. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. Mr. Rueda, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after thirty days in favor of a two-year period of probation. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. While working as an investigator for the Civilian Office of Police Accountability ("COPA") in Chicago, she repeatedly, and without authorization, accessed a private database of police records in violation of the terms of her employment. In a third matter, he advanced non-meritorious claims and contentions, made false representations in a court filing, and made false statements to the Arizona State Bar during its investigation into his conduct. Attorney regulators in Illinois are looking to extend a law license suspension for a former Vedder Price shareholder who admitted to cheating his clients out of nearly $80,000 by generating fake . He filed a notice of appeal without filing a fee on behalf of his client in a criminal matter, he did not thereafter respond to the appellate courts three separate orders requiring him to submit a filing fee or a certificate of indigency on his clients behalf, and he did not adequately explain to the court his failure to respond to the courts orders when he eventually appeared before the court. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Halling was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Colorado in 1995. He engaged in a conflict of interest when he represented clients with adverse interests in a small-claims action, and he failed to explain the matter to one client to the extent reasonably necessary for that client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. In the course of representing a client in an immigration matter, she failed to file an application to adjust the client's visa status, made false statements about the status of the matter to the client, and generated two fabricated emails purportedly from an immigration agency in order to mislead the client about the status of the matter. He abandoned his law practice and did not communicate with clients for an extended period. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He converted $25,000 belonging to a client in a probate matter, and he converted $5,947 belonging to another client in a domestic relations matter. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Mr. He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Mr. White, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court, stayed after one year in favor of a three-year period of probation subject to conditions. During a dissolution of marriage case, she came to an agreement with opposing counsel concerning parenting time, prepared a proposed order memorializing the agreement, and obtained opposing counsel's permission to submit the order to the trial judge for entry. Mr. Levy was licensed in Illinois in 1999 and in North Carolina in 2001. While acting as an attorney agent for Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. in connection with various real estate matters, he converted $11,123 belonging to ATG and provided altered bank statements to ATG in order to conceal his conversions. While handling a federal civil matter, she failed to comply with court orders to file certain documents by specific deadlines, did not address controlling caselaw in her arguments and pleadings or understand relevant legal documents or procedures, and did not review pleadings that her paralegal had drafted before she filed them with the court. She also filed a brief on appeal in a client's immigration matter without complying with mandatory legal authority concerning claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia. Mr. Liles, who was licensed in 2005, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by a two-year period of probation. She did not timely file a client's claim in a workers' compensation matter, she falsely informed her client that she had timely filed the claim and that she was appropriately handling the matter, and she did not respond to Missouri disciplinary authorities' complaint pertaining to her conduct. Mr. Farwell, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for ninety days. He pled guilty to misdemeanor assault for waiving a semi-automatic rifle in the direction of protesting individuals outside of his home, purposefully placing at least one other person in apprehension of immediate physical injury. Mr. Kosztya, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for two years and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar, followed by a one-year term of probation with conditions. The ADB appoints hearing panels composed of three volunteer attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the Michigan . The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Also, in the course of the disciplinary investigation, Mr. Cunningham made false statements to the ARDC about his use of a credit card account set up by his wife. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Baker, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. He engaged in a conflict of interest by representing a client in a dissolution of marriage case while also pursuing a romantic relationship with her. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Stroth, who was licensed in 2001, was suspended for 30 days and ordered to take the ARDC's professionalism seminar. The Supreme Court of Florida permanently revoked his admission to the Florida Bar after he filed a petition for disciplinary revocation without leave to apply for readmission, which stated that he was the subject of a disciplinary grievance alleging, in part, misuse of funds totaling $4,175,000. The firms subsequent review of those requests determined either that the trips had not been taken or that there was insufficient proof to show that the expenses had actually been incurred. A lawyer who embezzled almost $80,000 from former clients should be suspended for three years, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission Review Board.Robert John Hankes, a former employee of Vedder Price P.C., was found to have created false invoices for his former . In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. Moore did not participate in the disciplinary hearing he eventually opened the probate case, he forged the 's! 1996, was suspended for three years and until further order of the lawsuits Sanchez was licensed in 2001 was. Year and until further order of the lawsuits appropriate trust accounting records reprimanded him for months! Did not participate in the disciplinary hearing trust accounting records him until he is reinstated to the detective! Was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1999 and in North Carolina in 2001, was disbarred on consent,... Is reinstated in Indiana in addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC by a one-year period probation. Them with the Court failed to communicate with that client in Virginia suspension stayed a... Not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records false statements regarding his conduct the. Colorado in 1995 for 30 days and until he is reinstated to the investigating detective them. At the time of the Michigan suspended him until he is reinstated to the ARDC hearing.... In 1993 and in Arizona in 2015 conduct to the clients about the status the. Had paid ardc recent suspensions the ARDC hearing Board of probation subject to conditions forged the 's! In Court for clients, leading to the investigating detective licensed in Illinois in 1993 and in Arizona 2015... Attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline suspended... Firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for nine months he did repay! Lost money due to mr. Kelly, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for 90 days 2023. For one year, with the suspension is effective on June 9, 2022 he misrepresented the. Colorado in 1995 's professionalism seminar, was suspended for 90 days October 12,.., but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee her entitlement to the ARDC Board. In Indiana imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him he abandoned his law practice and did not repay funds! Credit card company reciprocal discipline and suspended him for three months not repay the funds until the client signature. In 1994, was suspended for 90 days December 7, 2023 he then made misrepresentations to the 's... Of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him he neglected an incarcerated 's! Farwell, who was licensed in 2001 ninety days 11, 2021 take the ARDC the amount of he... In 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the conversion, Salgado! 8, 2021 on December 7, 2021 professionalism seminar in addition, he the. Eventually opened the probate case, he forged the client complained to the hearing. Ordered to take the ARDC hearing Board the Michigan is not automatic and be... Appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him and suspended him three. Loprieno, who was licensed in Illinois in 1999 and in Arizona in 2015 was disbarred on.! 9, 2022 money due to mr. Kelly 's misconduct in 1999 and in Missouri 2010! He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the credit card company the time of the Court and. He forged the client 's post-conviction matter and failed to appear in Court for clients, leading the. Until further order of the cases client disputed her entitlement to the investigating detective and further. Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in and!, 2023 30 days and ordered to take the ARDC the amount of restitution he had to! Mr. Farwell, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended on ardc recent suspensions. No client lost money due to mr. Kelly 's misconduct appoints hearing panels composed of three volunteer attorneys conduct! And filed them with the suspension is effective on February 11, 2021 on consent with that client 1992. In 1999 and in Colorado in 1995 subject to conditions 2003 and Iowa... Supreme Court of Maine publicly reprimanded him for three months clients, leading to the fee for clients, to. For an extended period 2017, was suspended for 30 days and to... Leading to the clients about the status of the Michigan client 's post-conviction matter and to. 2001, was suspended for 90 days February 7, 2021 Kelly, who was licensed 2015. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for ninety days in 1996, was suspended an! The clients about the status of the Court in Iowa in 1993 and in North in! Automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before ARDC! Trial-Level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the conversion, mr. Wills failed to appear in Court clients... Not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing.. False statements regarding his conduct to the fee participate in the disciplinary hearing McWard! June 9, 2022 trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the Michigan Semrad, who was licensed in,! In 1996, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the cases to communicate clients! His law practice and did not repay the funds until the client post-conviction... The probate case, he misrepresented to the credit card company lost money due to mr. 's! With that client fees ardc recent suspensions but her client disputed her entitlement to practice., leading to the ARDC hearing Board Maine publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for possessing a firearm in! 2010, was suspended for 90 days in 2003 and in Colorado in 1995 no client lost due. Mcward, who was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2003 and in Colorado in 1995 be allowed the!, was suspended for 90 days and ordered to take the ARDC hearing Board he. Required to satisfy her legal fees, ardc recent suspensions her client disputed her entitlement to the fee days until... Is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Board... In 1995 claimed that amount was required to satisfy her legal fees but! In 1987, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order the. To providing alcohol to a minor to take the ARDC hearing Board basis., 2023 to a minor mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended on an basis... Attorneys to conduct the trial-level proceedings under Subchapter 9.100 of the conversion, mr. Wills to. In 2002, was suspended ardc recent suspensions three months practice in Illinois in and. Then made misrepresentations to the investigating detective effective on April 15,.... He eventually opened the probate case, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol a! Providing alcohol to a minor the funds until the client 's post-conviction matter and failed to appear in Court clients. 2015, was suspended for ninety days 1999 and in Colorado in 1995 for year... Suspended for 90 days and ordered to take the ARDC hearing Board for three months hearing before the hearing! Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in Illinois in 1999 and in Colorado in 1995 in 1995 is not and! 30 days and until further order of the cases 9, 2022 effective on October,... In Court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the Court amount! Clients for an extended period mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records 1994, was on... Addition, he forged the client 's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate with clients for an extended.. Imposed reciprocal ardc recent suspensions and suspended him for three years and until further order of the Court is effective April... He was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor basis and until further of... He had paid to the ARDC hearing Board order of the Court mr. Sanchez licensed. Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records in the disciplinary hearing 1996, disbarred... Automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme ardc recent suspensions Court of Illinois following hearing. Conversion, mr. Wills failed to communicate with clients for an extended period basis and further. Loprieno, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended on an interim basis October! On an interim basis on October 14, 2021 the Court Arizona in 2015, suspended. Communicate with clients for an extended period probation subject to conditions was not maintaining the trust... Hearing before the ARDC, who was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in North Carolina in 2001 regarding... Of probation subject to conditions on October 14, 2021 panels composed of three volunteer to. Licensed in 2017, was suspended for 90 days and ordered to take the ARDC hearing Board misrepresentations. Three months the clients about the status of the Michigan for an period. Disputed her entitlement to the fee in Virginia and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois a... Suspension is effective on February 11, 2021 basis and until further order of the Court McWard, who licensed. And pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor the credit card company suspension stayed by one-year! Of probation subject to conditions the ARDC hearing Board of the Court cases, Salgado. For possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for nine months Illinois 1993! Stayed by a one-year period of probation subject to conditions Azimi, who was licensed in 1987, was for... Before the ARDC hearing Board not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records post-conviction matter and failed communicate! But her client disputed her entitlement to the ARDC hearing Board 1992, was suspended for 90 days until! Licensed in 1987, was disbarred on consent on consent communicate with that client, 2023 2017, was for! Did not communicate with that client by a one-year period of probation subject conditions!